I know I haven’t posted anything new or of any importance lately, but I wanted to get a few different opinions on this word problem I’ve been thinking about.
Two words; romance and intimacy.
Two definitions; “physical closeness and togetherness” and “mental closeness and togetherness”.
Which goes with which?
If anyone could offer their opinion (a why or how would also be greatly appreciated) that would be absolutely lovely.
“Speech may be sublime but there’s something in the symbols.”
“Suppose someone said: every familiar word, in a book for example, actually carries an atmosphere with it in our minds, a ‘corona’ of faintly indicated uses. —Just as if each figure in a painting were surrounded by delicate shadowy drawings of scenes, as it were in another dimension, and in them we saw the figures in different contexts. —Let’s take this assumption very seriously!”
–Wittgenstein, PI Pt.II §35
They say you can find math in nature, that it’s already there. Similarly, you can find metaphor in understanding seamlessly.
Language is a shadow–and with it come shadows.
Shadows are created by three things; light, angle, perspective.